“We’re living at a time when attention is the new currency. Those who insert themselves into as many channels as possible look set to capture the most value.”
-Pete Cashmore, Founder of Mashable.com
Every notable corporation, public entity, and public person in Canada uses social media to some extent. Even my mother uses Facebook (relentlessly). Most people who do not engage in social media, it seems, do so out of protest or privacy concerns; we take it for granted that those who don’t use social media avoid it on purpose. Why shouldn’t we? The United Nations declared Internet access to be a basic human right two years ago, and as a G8 country, Canada can afford to provide it.
Not everyone has access, though, and if attention really is the new currency, we may be further impoverishing our poorest citizens.
Most of us have data available on our smartphones, so we can check in any time we like with Facebook, Twitter, or news apps. These are basic acts that we do sporadically all day, every day. Are people without smartphones or readily available computer terminals really missing out?
For the uses most people get from social media, the answer is probably no – the ability to chuckle at a cat meme is a low-priority accomplishment, in evolutionary terms, anyway. But when it comes to larger social issues, social media is more and more becoming the measure we use to tell who is switched on, and who doesn’t care.
Take Idle No More, for example. The First Nations-driven movement started with a hashtag, yet in a community with a massive Aboriginal representation, many people in the Downtown Eastside likely don’t know anything about it. The goals of the movement likely directly affect them, but their voices are silenced through a disconnection from the medium in which the movement lives. For most of us, social media is a luxury, but as it becomes central to our identity as citizens we need to make sure it is open to everyone.
This article first appeared on the UBC Master’s of Journalism website, The Thunderbird.
The hub of a recycling-based micro-economy in the Downtown Eastside is about to lose the home it’s had on East Hastings Street for nearly two decades.
If the development proposal by a social housing non-profitgroup is approved, Atira Development Society, which owns 41 E. Hastings St., will build a 169-unit project on the site and displace United We Can.
CEO Janice Abbott says the development will unavoidably bring change to the street, known for the chaotic market that has sprung up in front of the much-praised recycling centre that has provided employment for hundreds in the troubled neighbourhood.
“It will be difficult for folks to congregate on the block while construction is going on. Whether people will come back…who knows?” said Abbott, whose application for the project went in to the city on Nov. 2.
“United We Can is moving, so the folks that currently line up to get into United We Can will be somewhere else. So I’m guessing it will be a less busy and visible block.”
While some may welcome that, not everyone is convinced that it will be an improvement. Some community groups, as well as the binners themselves, are wary of the gentrification that has further marginalized already vulnerable residents elsewhere in the Downtown Eastside. They worry that this project will have the same effect, ripping out what is, for many, the economic heart of the community.
Abbott insists that the project will add value to the community.
“Let me be clear that we are a community-based organization,” she said. “And it will remain a block for the community.”
As of yet, United We Can has nowhere to go. While the city and the recycling centre have been seeking an alternative for some time, no plans have been revealed. Abbott says she knows they are looking. It’s been difficult to find a site because the operation can’t be put in the catchment areas of private recycling centres elsewhere.
Chris George, who has been binning in Vancouver for three years, worries about the possibility of a more distant United We Can.
“It would be a problem for us,” he said.
Don’t say that! That’s bad karma, man.”
-“Ray,” binner for 15 years
While Abbott understands that the new development will transform the block, she believes it will be a change for the better.
Abbott is the CEO of both the development and the women’s resource branches of Atira, as well as its for-profit property management arm.
The building, valued at $2.2-million, is one of $33-million worth of land and buildings owned between the Atira Development Society and its parent group, the Atira Women’s Resource Society.
The proposed mixed-use building would contain 169 units, 70 per cent of which would be social housing – far more than any project besides those built by BC Housing. The new Woodward’s building, just a block and a half away, has only 27 per cent of the building’s total units devoted to subsidized housing.
The plan for rest of the space in the proposed development is uncertain.
According to the rezoning proposal filed with the city, the other 30 per cent of the building would be set aside for affordable home ownership. According to Abbott, however, financial considerations may interfere.
“It’s driven by the pro forma. At the end of the day, we need to borrow money to make this work, and so we need to find a lender who likes the way our financials worth. It may be 100 per cent rental.”
The moving sidewalk
The building’s current tenant,United We Can, is not just a business. Its influence spills out on to the street outside, with the whole block bustling with foot traffic and sidewalk sales.
For some, this congregation of people selling goods, lining up for the recycling depot, or simply lingering, is an eyesore. For others, it is essential.
Ivan Drury, a social activist with the Carnegie Community Action Project, believes that the volume of foot traffic makes that block safer for homeless people.
“It’s kind of an unregulated community centre,” he explains.
Drury is well known as a vehement opponent of many developments in the neighbourhood. This proposed zoning change is no exception.
“Regardless of the merits, any kind of market project there has the danger of driving up the value of land, proving that condos can be developed here in the heart of the Downtown Eastside, and warming the plate for speculators to … displace the thousands of really marginalized people here.”
Street vendors crowd the sidewalk despite the potential $250 fine for those without permits. Many of their goods, from harmonicas to strollers, are non-recyclables that have been salvaged from binning excursions.
Bruce Matinat, pushing a shopping cart heavy with about $25 in cans from Kitsilano, said that he often finds other items in the lanes that he frequents. On this particular day, he had a small collection of mirrors.
“I’ll probably sell those, too,” he said.
Binner: an urban scavenger, who makes a living collecting recyclables and other goods from around the city. Can often walk 10km or more in search of recyclables.
The users of United We Can also emphasize the importance of the location. It has been providing income and employment in the Downtown Eastside for 17 years since Ken Lyotier founded it.
The facility is situated among those who make the most use of it, and it is the only commercial recycling centre in the Downtown Eastside.
The central location has allowed United We Can, in the original entrepreneurial spirit of the business, to provide services beyond collecting recyclables.
Today, the recycling centre employs about 100 people, many of them former binners, as cashiers and in its spinoff laneway cleaning program.It can often serve as many as 700 binners in a day.
Its clients, however, are not limited to downtown in their search for recyclables.
“Our catchment is pretty broad,” says Lyotier, now retired. “People come from all over.”
One binner, who wished to only be identified as “Ray,” was distraught at the idea of a new location for United We Can.
“Don’t say that! That’s bad karma, man,” he exclaimed. “I live right here.”
For an interactive map of binning in Vancouver, click here.